׉?4ׁB!בCט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://1CaUJttrypUWsoHoynqcbKlg2nS819bObGLAJvu4R-Q vr`׉	 7cassandra://I-xJ3lnxb2RYv8ZNA3PlZrMqb7DnZyn40rQGeCVsFR8Δ`t׉	 7cassandra://u9GsWpUjNQQF2ohqPn4j00e1Q-YMI_y6eQp6MaXmpgk<` ׉	 7cassandra://0x72mniGr2VKCDtaMpPprQHBJYOMfCJSOQBXDMER7jc Q+n͠bd!r+`Pט   8pu׈   `n  ׈Ed!r+`*׉E1
June, 2023
Volume 7, Issue 2
CARICAD is pleased to bring to you a repeat of a series of articles on Strategic HRM and Succession Planning. Just
before COVID-19 arrived, we had completed a regional survey to find out how many people had succession plans
in place and very few did. We therefore recognised that the need for succession planning is even greater than
before. This will enable a public service that is resilient, but subject to change. The public service must be in a
place where it can thrive in an organic way so that the leadership and technical skills that should be in place,
are in place. To this end, we just completed a Succession Planning toolkit which will be available on request.
By Rosemund R. Warrington, HR and ODE Specialist, CARICAD
T
his article recognises the contextualised
nature of public sector ransformation in
a complex, frequently intransient and
change-averse system, and identifies some
factors that are necessary in order for public
sector organisations to attain resilience
status. These include the importance of:
citizen centricity, technology, human capital
development, systemic transformation and a
focus on outcomes.
It is widely accepted that change is the
one constant in organisational life
today. Virtually all organisations are
affected whether it is by the forces
of nature, globalisation, shifts in the economy, or an
ever-changing workforce. In the context of public
sector organisations, the management of change has
indeed been a constant. Yet, the speed with which
governments must respond to the diverse crises is
not always swift, partly owing to insufficient resilience
to overcome these adverse effects on their own.
Public sector organisations in the Caribbean have
faced much pressure to change in recent years
largely due to vulnerability to natural disasters and
environmental change, fiscal austerity measures,
limited institutional capacity, and the desire to deliver
world class efficiencies through public sector
transformation efforts. Transformation
initiatives within the public sector, however,
have a checkered history of success.
The majority of countries in the
Caribbean have been classified as having
Rosemund R. Warrington,
CARICAD’s HR and ODE Specialist
high vulnerability (i.e. environmental risks,
economic shocks, social risks and
limited institutional capacity) and
medium resilience (i.e policy-induced
measures, good governance,
macroeconomic stability, social
development market flexibility),
the worst case category being Haiti
with high vulnerability and low resilience, (Briguglio
2014). There is now a recognition and acceptance
that in order to survive, public sector organisations
in the Caribbean region can no longer simply respond
to changes in their environment, but they must
proactively shape their environment to maximise
their own effectiveness. The context for this change
is based on a number of philosophies guiding the
transformation of public sector organisations,
including post bureaucracy models.
• Continues on Pages 3-5
׉	 7cassandra://u9GsWpUjNQQF2ohqPn4j00e1Q-YMI_y6eQp6MaXmpgk<` d!r+`+d!r+`*ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://14mnAfD9lhSkT0uQZtDbPv0QjIbu6_hl_FspR2rQLNA }`׉	 7cassandra://GQ2UvcYaYtRJSHi0LcbcN2Sl4tiK1KiL1bxwf7hOHDsͦ`t׉	 7cassandra://QE2tv73VRlRkIdHLg3Vi8PnZyheASI_5kqLN0Ll89_Y0S` ׉	 7cassandra://DBxFOWLNCaut3Fbr9AcOlXmfvMVmhloOVPtbM2G3QLg (͠bd!r+`Sט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://F7mtJ0wtbW8H_TUyu8SraKgE4ah5v3veC-ouGSJOU88 [`׉	 7cassandra://H66XkXTz3R4ZX39oraLKyIcU8_Vk4S_ATYmh3FHg9r4͋`t׉	 7cassandra://T3-chjl36m65bMyes9Kk3yZeO_TQAfAPvOG2ap06Fdo.` ׉	 7cassandra://EMZOklRvNIPyYdCr3eqgYphyW3rsWNcUepz5ycLYmb8 c'͠bd!r+`T׉E
2
• Continued from Page 1
Post Bureaucracy Models
Public Sector organisations by their very structure and nature reflect Weber’s bureaucratic legal-rational
framework with structured hierarchies; formalisation of decision-making; centralisation of authority;
rational systems based on rules and regulations and advancement based, still to a large extent, on
seniority and ‘know who’.
There has been, however, a steady movement towards transformation in public sector organisations
throughout the Caribbean region as they struggle to stay afloat in the midst of social, economic and
technological advancements. In this new context of the post-industrial public sector organisation with a
keen focus on services and resilience, new management techniques are being adopted in an attempt to
reform and transform.
There is now the post-bureaucratic public sector, characterized by collaboration, trust, negotiation,
teamwork and decentralisation of authority. The new model of public service operations, based on New
Public Management (NPM) as a philosophy, advocates a shift in emphasis from rule enforcement and
administration to the attainment of results through mission statements, performance management,
performance-based rewards, greater client focus, decentralised structures and an output orientation.
Indeed, the challenges of the changing times and effects of devastating events in our Caribbean region
have recently given rise to touting of the concept of ‘Organisational Resilience’. Public Sector
organisations are seeing the need to become more resilient in the face of adversity and committing
themselves to becoming more agile, adaptable, flexible and responsive to the needs of citizens. This
rethinking is driven by the realities that traditional bureaucracy may be inadequate to cope with the
myriad global changes and therefore public sector organisations have no choice but to move beyond
basic survival, reinvent the wheel to stay relevant, and press on in these threatening environments.
Only flexible, agile and adaptable organisations will survive.
21st Century Public Sector
These rolling trends of reinventing the public sector have significant implications not only for
transforming the nature of public administration and its relationship with the citizenry, but also for role,
structure, systems and the management of human resources. In a climate of budget cuts and an
inflated workforce where competency-based job-fit is still a challenge, a 21st Century Public Sector
implies a further radical shakeup to the status quo.
The following schema therefore focuses on public sector transformation in general and exemplifies the
characteristics of the 21st Century Public Sector, which are necessary in order to achieve high resilience
status and desired results.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://QE2tv73VRlRkIdHLg3Vi8PnZyheASI_5kqLN0Ll89_Y0S` d!r+`,׉Ep3
• Continued from previous page
Building a Resilient 21st Century public sector is therefore all about the right systems, right skills, right
leadership, and a culture that is conducive to change. The Public Sector must move beyond crisis
management to scenario planning. The Public Sector must become more visionary and outward-focused.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://T3-chjl36m65bMyes9Kk3yZeO_TQAfAPvOG2ap06Fdo.` d!r+`-d!r+`,ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://NgBE3q6D3GkC4hIeMyzkk9dlxU4C8EdseI6PzfrVyGQ ND` ׉	 7cassandra://aac35605FEnml-QHUtt7ghBK4rsfpa9EUjcyHP8qCQQñ`t׉	 7cassandra://XgMxV6pyYo_Bk7U2NRqZY1ggR-qqR6JIShWPxHQDjCk5_` ׉	 7cassandra://sozK8do8RITuZsciZGJ0If7KNVDzGgKDZM4fs_H0tyM (͠bd!r+`Wט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://zccWn5b41QnPixGx-1i6cyGoobzVHeFctiV4mNp6Tpc >` ׉	 7cassandra://cDgNXDMThtTz0lrLDA5rJvhfl2TeAVbU8L1cOUDIRfsͮE`t׉	 7cassandra://FjTaEEFDjsJznsv4aevCopLdb0iCAq8VLMnD1wngkS42>` ׉	 7cassandra://bosmni9y-CUp8I7ZixI-fMWXaCoXIr57ca5j87PbPXc /12͠bd!r+`X׉EE4
• Continued from previous page
But what does being a Resilient organisation really mean? There are a number of differing perspectives
regarding the definition for organisational resilience. On the one hand, organizational resilience is viewed as
simply an ability to rebound from unexpected, stressful, adverse situations and to pick up where you left off.
This perspective is reflected in the following definition, i.e. “Resilience is the ability to ‘bounce back’ from
adversity” (Frederickson 2001 cited in Cooper et al, 2015). A second perspective of organizational resilience,
on the other hand, looks beyond restoration to include the development of new capabilities and an
expanded ability to keep pace with and even create new opportunities, viz “Resilience is bouncing back from
setbacks combined with remaining effective in the face of tough demands and difficulty circumstances” -
Cooper et al, 2015). Vogus and Sutcliffe (2007) also define resilience as “the maintenance of positive
adjustment under challenging conditions such that the organisation emerges from those conditions
strengthened and more resourceful”. The latter perspectives coincide with how CARICAD has expressed the
imperatives for managing in a crisis i.e. Prepare, Perform, Transform. We agree that anticipation and
preparation are valuable for organizational performance. We believe however that resilience implies more
than just adaptation; it requires a concerted effort to improve overall HR competence and systemic
capabilities through transformation efforts.
The following definition is therefore apt: “Organisational Resilience involves the ability to adapt creatively
and constructively to change so as to endure and recover from challenges in a manner that leaves the
organisation more flexible and better able to adapt to future challenges. (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2009).
Resilient organisations are able to maintain positive adjustments under challenging and “bouncy” conditions
such as natural disasters or national fiscal hardships, among others. The Resilient 21st Century Public Sector
will be (1) Technologically Innovative and data driven: freely accessible and shareable data, greater
focus on IT as an enabler of service, and increased transparency, public participation and innovation; (2)
Systemically transformative: institutional transformation relative to structures, leadership, partnerships,
procedures and practices, mindset change, management of human and financial resources etc.; (3) Talent
Management focused: attracting, selecting, nurturing, developing and retaining high‑potential; (4)
Outcomes focused: focus on results and on achieving impact; and (5) Citizen-centric: delivery of
services based on the needs of the people served and engaging citizens in policy and service design.
In addition, being resilient is about actively taking risk, learning from it and understanding the benefits.
Conversely, ‘Brittle’ organisations are easily overwhelmed by shocks and strains, and do not subscribe to the
belief that they can become more effective through learning from their mistakes. It is therefore the capacity
for the public sector not only to “bounce back”, “survive” or “cope successfully” in response to adversity,
uncertainty, change or risk, but to do so “robustly” and recover more “quickly”. It is this capacity for
adaptation and use of sound systems and change management that facilitates resilience.
The need for building the capacity for public officers to be resilient in turbulent times and in work
environments that are continually adapting and responding to harsh conditions cannot be underestimated.
For in times such as these, only flexible, agile and adaptable organisations will survive.
Part II of this article will now focus on the role of Strategic HRM in building organisational resilience.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://XgMxV6pyYo_Bk7U2NRqZY1ggR-qqR6JIShWPxHQDjCk5_` d!r+`.׉E
N5
By Rosemund R. Warrington, HR and ODE Specialist, CARICAD
This article builds upon Part I of the Building a Resilient 21st
Century Public Sector series. While Part I focused on the nature
of organisational resilience, Part II aims to increase
understanding of how to shape an organisation’s strategic human
resource management approach to achieve organisational
resilience.
T
he definition of the term “Resilience” adopted in Part I
of the series states that “Organisational Resilience
involves the ability to adapt creatively and constructively
to change so as to endure and recover from challenges
in a manner that leaves the organisation more flexible and better
able to adapt to future challenges.” (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2009).
“Organisational Resilience
involves the ability to adapt
creatively and constructively
to change so as to endure and
recover from challenges in a
manner that leaves the
organisation more flexible and
better able to adapt
to future challenges.”
- Denhardt & Denhardt, 2009
Part I made the case that Public Sector organisations are increasingly seeing the need to become more
resilient in the face of adversity and committing themselves to becoming more agile, adaptable, flexible
and responsive to the needs of citizens. Indeed, resilience implies more than just adaptation; and as this
article will show, a sustained resolute effort is required to improve overall HR competence and systemic
capabilities through transformation efforts.
Part I established that the Resilient 21st Century Public Sector will be:
(1) Technologically Innovative and data driven: freely accessible and shareable data, greater
focus on IT as an enabler of service, and increased transparency, public participation and
innovation;
(2) Systemically transformative: institutional transformation relative to structures, leadership,
partnerships, procedures and practices, mindset change, management of human and financial
resources etc.;
(3) Talent Management focused: attracting, selecting, nurturing, developing and retaining high
potential;
(4) Outcomes focused: focus on results and on achieving impact; and
(5) Citizen-centric: delivery of services based on the needs of the people served and engaging
citizens in policy and service design.
Building a Resilient 21st Century public sector therefore is all about the right systems, right skills, right
leadership, and a culture that is conducive to change. Strategic Human Resource Management has a
critical role to play.
Strategic HRM
There are a number of assumptions underpinning a Strategic Approach to HRM including the following:
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://FjTaEEFDjsJznsv4aevCopLdb0iCAq8VLMnD1wngkS42>` d!r+`/d!r+`.ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://piyLrrxEhQk25xdB-XnoFHgphQW5QIUTHYdVwQ9LEG0 l` ׉	 7cassandra://A7TRYT2EFZK2IRtgr2RVT6T0C6o5QEj6iL2xdCODxUIͤ`t׉	 7cassandra://N1INDN5NCA7s01azTdA8YPEuCAtRUek0plVj_O-Nyxo0` ׉	 7cassandra://RWwVOTnhDJ5tOq1Q2OopE4jWL_d2xTh3bcrDGKQVizk .V͠bd!r+`[ט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://GMqkvsBuznVi3M5uN9fRNIpUqVtxoczXGPpYmkv5l70 "`׉	 7cassandra://ohDMtggbwbiFUlO60G0eFSjT-cyjTnXE7--tviiSeek|'`t׉	 7cassandra://2PZY8CLBRLIskZ2kPvsQjFo97wz2u363RalaF1phIu4,`` ׉	 7cassandra://9VPHAsHMeje8auEg6abzmK0UaeuKzys59c1WSMOOkOw lt,͠bd!r+`\׉E 6
• Continued from previous page
a) Human Resources are an organisation’s source of competitive advantage and are therefore to be
considered human capital. All public sector employees are valued as key to optimum
organisational performance balanced against their own career-pathing for personal and
professional development.
b) HR Plans are linked to the organisation’s Strategic Plans; therefore there is alignment between the
organisation’s goals and initiatives, and HR goals in order to make best use of the human capital.
a) Employee skills are viewed as talents, and managing this skills set in order to create optimal
performance is deemed talent management.
a) The focus is on employees at all levels of the Public Sector, including its strategic leadership in
both the technical, administrative and political directorates, for example, the Permanent
Secretaries and the Honourable Ministers with responsibility for the ministerial portfolios.
a) Optimum use of employees’ talents – knowledge, skills, aptitudes and attitude – is shared
responsibility of both the specialist HR officers (who function in the HR Departments and Units),
and the front line supervisors, corporate or supervisory, who are the ‘front line’ transacting with
the rank and file workers to produce and deliver services as laid out in the various Corporate
Plans.
a) The HR Plan highlights the importance of ‘line of sight’ monitoring and evaluation of the HR results
against the agreed standards of performance and in light of the resources consistently available
for the purpose. M & E enable performance tracking to be evidence-based and cost benefit
anchored.
The Seven HR Building Blocks for a Resilient Organisation
CARICAD’s Charter framework for Caribbean Public Services embodies the tenets of resilient
organisations. The pillars and core principles promote good governance, service standards,
accountability, better information processing, continuous capacity and competence enhancement,
engaging in proactive analyses and modernization of legislative. In recognition of the fact that any
Resilience building can only occur in the context of a solid foundation and enabling environment, the
base of the 7 Block Model highlights the six pillars of our Charter framework, namely, Governance,
Accountability, Standards, Openness, Capacity and Legislation.
CARICAD recognises the critical role that strategic HRM plays in relation to the quality of work and
productivity in public sector organisations, and using this capacity as a force for resilience. The Seven HR
Building Blocks Model has been designed to espouse a mindset that integrates HR practices, processes,
and systems; utilising effective ways of planning, attracting, developing and retaining talent as well as
managing performance for results.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://N1INDN5NCA7s01azTdA8YPEuCAtRUek0plVj_O-Nyxo0` d!r+`0׉EO7
• Continued from previous page
The Model, illustrated and explained below, consists of seven building blocks – HR resilience enablers -
which serve as guideposts to individual behaviours and come together to create organisational
capabilities to respond to turbulent situations in an effective manner.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://2PZY8CLBRLIskZ2kPvsQjFo97wz2u363RalaF1phIu4,`` d!r+`1d!r+`0ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://boE2SRicm2wJYsbx7l9uw6cCH_b_EtA4cnG5BAKSIdA 4` ׉	 7cassandra://cjSIxVRSZJGH8CWgEpyk78GBxsMz-Tw9eYBLNhsUAyk͢%`t׉	 7cassandra://KSTstTaaC8pUCMpKgi8rF9NHdH70xrsAAp4tQqyvQBY0"` ׉	 7cassandra://DHtnEgeY5DfO9it-M5_w9nf04Yf6PwZoRZjf_5rCOEE /P͠bd!r+`^ט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://rxCcWqNvfaQAR-EDK_GQ87Py01AlTS0ui_KoWGBNF0k d` ׉	 7cassandra://N4Y55Jjulx3OOxE0pAk-XHtPpNfZ32rJ4jgo7zbYTeQ͘`t׉	 7cassandra://Af-ee13XFvjfteXRuYATvcVRlAeFOtjmpcLG4GcPQhI/` ׉	 7cassandra://wf5WE8pUiK8bfDHva4zdHyO0aRmAfrh_nlgbSVsKimk +/n͠bd!r+`_׉E
/8
• Continued from previous page
Building a Culture of Resilience
When considering an organisations’s capability for resilience, prominence must be given to managing
culture. It is precisely for this reason that strategic human resource management (SHRM) is central
to the establishment and maintenance of an organisation’s leadership structure and cultural values.
A number of cultural drivers supporting HR processes include the ability to engage stakeholders,
alignment of individual needs to the long term resilience needs of the public sector, the ability to
develop a capability for the management of adversity. A culture of organizational resilience is also
built to a great extent on resilient leadership.
Resilient organisations uphold a culture of respect and trust to take necessary risks without the fear
of retribution. Indeed what is needed is a positive culture that effectively promotes values such as
courage, initiative, integrity, loyalty, trust, teamwork and open communication. This positive culture
will be mirrored in the organisation’s ability to lead teams to high performance; build trust-based
relationships; and successfully undertake cross functional work assignments.
Organisations that are truly resilient empower their staff to be proactive and responsive to create
readiness for change, in whatever circumstance. In an environment of resilience, the active
contribution of individuals’ and teams’ ideas and efforts is promoted.
Finally, resilient organisations care about the well-being of employees as they work diligently to
deliver results. The well-being of public officers must therefore not only be the concern of
representative unions, but also of management at every level of the organisation.
Systemic Leadership
The importance of leadership in shaping a resilience culture in public sector organisations cannot be
overstated. Some of the required attributes of the ‘leader’ and leadership teams include the
influencing of an organisational resilience approach that contribute to the strategic direction,
culture, performance, continuous improvement, relationship building and overall organisational
resilience in the Public Sector. Clarity of interrelationships and respective roles of the Permanent
Secretary, the CEO, the Committee of Permanent Secretaries, ‘the Board’, lower level and ad hoc
management teams and how these linkages influence an organisation’s potential for resilience are
critical considerations.
Context matters for resilience building and as such, an enabling environment that supports agile
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://KSTstTaaC8pUCMpKgi8rF9NHdH70xrsAAp4tQqyvQBY0"` d!r+`2׉E	9
• Continued from previous page
leadership and the ability to quickly readjust must be central to achieving Resilience status.
Connecting Employee and Oganisational Strategy
The upsurge of connected devices and emerging technologies continues to enable seamless
connectivity in public sector organisations. Connecting new work expectations and norms to
strategies, through e-Governance will be fundamental to building a Resilient organisation. This will
require revision of policies and key organisational and job roles. Going forward there will be a mix of
various work models – traditional but also increased out-sourcing, stakeholder partnerships, etc.
Linking the public sector employee with the organisation’s strategy and goals is important and
therefore making the right skills available at the right places to support specific technologicallyinnovative
strategies will be extremely crucial in building resilience.
All of this must be underpinned by a strong sense of purpose, core values, shared vision and a
deliberate use of language that promotes a clear sense of direction and one that influences attitudeshaping,
relationship-building and actions.
Aligning HR Policies and Practices
Facilitating individual capability for resilience is the strategic role and framework that human
resource management systems offer. Through strategic HRM systems, process, policies and
practices, public sector organisations will have the opportunity for setting a framework within which
public officers foster their individual capability to be resilient.
It is being proposed that the development of strategic HRM policies and programmes take into
account not just overarching HR principles and the strategic direction of the public sector, but also
take into account the desired employee contributions that the programmes and policies aim to
capture. For example, if collaboration as a behaviour is desired from public officers, then the HR
policies and programmes need to capture and reinforce the message through the systemic guidelines
that are laid out for the organisation.
CARICAD is proposing the development and enhancement of HR systems and programmes that
would result in fostering resilience outcomes in public sector employees through competency-based
Human Resource Management Policies.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://Af-ee13XFvjfteXRuYATvcVRlAeFOtjmpcLG4GcPQhI/` d!r+`3d!r+`2ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://5-qB0fK7nOG3Me7zPSJjey-m2Iv9lh6QH6B7Ng0kADc >` ׉	 7cassandra://IpoBykM0Rl7ABnBfMZT3ZQM9E2-fMG-Se0ZYjQNqCsM͢`t׉	 7cassandra://FtdaYoUrZfkAYzp0dXlGZcmfVazsRj4dqI_2UtehuqU/R` ׉	 7cassandra://sdsljR4Z2VI8JOz8NPB2yCktn5027VFUVsniwLVy9CY /J͠bd!r+`aט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://fRpuhJRgmWmSO3sK1BnTdoMezG-8mJutrf24NXBEX68 zj` ׉	 7cassandra://dB1bVeWjDdq_FowCSg-2D22YK_aS146DqgPqM6UBJ-w͏`t׉	 7cassandra://7Wmh4LfD0JwocrQOKKkoMDSkwl90aqukq0geUwoWeyg+` ׉	 7cassandra://afesUnkwNfRU9g91dz-HtQdpHmI5XGBVtl9UYpkVSXY .Z͠bd!r+`b׉E
10
• Continued from previous page
Competencies are the skills, knowledge and behaviours that are required to perform certain activities
well and which are critical to success in building a resilient organisation. In other words, public
officers are competent if they know what to do; know how to do it; know when to do it; know why
you do it; and can do it consistently well;
A Competency Framework was recently disseminated by CARICAD for the guidance of its Member
States. It identifies a number of core competencies and behavioural anchors for increasing
professional competence in the public sector. In short, the competency framework defines how people
employed in the Public Sector are to work.
All key HR practices including recruitment, selection and retention; job descriptions; results-based
performance management; accountability; integrated information systems; engaging public officers in
proactive programmes of resilience training, among others, should operate in harmony to drive
employee engagement. These programmes should seek not only to foster general well-being and
enhance the immediate working experience for public officers, but also equip them with skills and
strategies to embrace future challenges, change and uncertainty.
Reinforcing Business Processes
Public sector organisations continue to be subject to government initiatives and legislation which result
in the need to improve processes. From time to time it is necessary to design new processes to change
and improve efficiency and effectiveness.
In building Resilient organisations, Process Improvement is one of the ways public sector organisations
can address the challenges of increasing Effectiveness, Efficiency, Capacity, Flexibility and
Responsiveness. This will require application of organisation development principles.
Organisational resilience supports the organisation’s ability to reinvent business processes and
strategies as circumstances change. This requires strategic flexibility, high performance work systems,
and multi-skilled public sector employees to steer the course through the environment.
Workforce Planning
A simple, often quoted definition, is that workforce planning involves ensuring that there are the right
number of people, with the right skills, in the right place, at the right time. Workforce planning is
therefore simply about arriving at existing and future demand for different types of employees,
matching this to the likely future supply, and assessing the impact on training, recruitment and
retention plans.
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://FtdaYoUrZfkAYzp0dXlGZcmfVazsRj4dqI_2UtehuqU/R` d!r+`4׉E	11
• Continued from previous page
Workforce planning during challenging times is a must. Financial and headcount constraints will impact
on the ability to recruit; essentially this means that more will have to be done with fewer people.
Maximising the use of the existing workforce has all sorts of implications for HR – training, performance
management, relocations, selective retention initiatives in some areas and selective redundancies in
others. One of the most important is to ensure that workforce plans are in place to align HR capacity in
terms of numbers and skills with Public Sector mission, vision and service deliverables.
Integrated Talent Management
Talent Management is often described as the systematic attraction, identification, development,
engagement/retention, and deployment of talents1 (Public Personnel Management, 2017). Integrated
talent management is an organisation's commitment to recruit, retain, and develop employees.
integrated approach to recruitment, retention, succession planning, performance management,
compensation, employee development planning and learning.
• According to Deloitte (A New Talent Management Framework, 2010) the goal is not only to make
the Human Resources function operate more efficiently, but more importantly to create an
"integrated system" for managing people which allows for the rapid and effective response to
organisational needs.
•
In a Resilient Organisation, the practice of Integrated Talent Management is key to sustaining an
organization’s initiatives and performance and to ensuring it meets its mission even in the face of
turnover and other workforce challenges. The system must enable the identification and
development of individuals who would be able to step in and step up in times of crisis. Managing
the system in a transparent and equitable way will enhance the organisation’s capacity to be
resilient and generate productive results and outcomes, even when faced with adversity.
• Sustaining such a system, will require the public sector organisation to foster an environment that
encourages high performance, continuous professional development, and recognises existing talent
and the transfer of knowledge to future talent.
It is an
1 Source: Public Personnel Management, December 1, 2017
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://7Wmh4LfD0JwocrQOKKkoMDSkwl90aqukq0geUwoWeyg+` d!r+`5d!r+`4ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://iU1K3EMKxQ3AfVTvQzeaarWHKSKexqS4ML_LBjNNYT4 ` ׉	 7cassandra://KF6xKOElhfxK8Oh_Nf4O499EwZ0wRddzkObFJ1HLNYQ͹{`t׉	 7cassandra://B7WWqe58GTA8ZRIanfWwVCjuDRbtNjFsDOfXn377_t42` ׉	 7cassandra://9ffKV7ahcaV3kA3uVRJLxGV_Qd7zaFBqv7TMoGJ2ynI j-͠bd!r+`dט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://8j6EHxVex6jEDehemlw21zoZnoL_sVWNKFGFE4U04ew ` ׉	 7cassandra://shTEbRQRzWJPO22uwqdWypjAfRe_hFdhHHqxYvHqSHgͥ`t׉	 7cassandra://OrDb1lg5ZHYlW_DcNOvM22GWjBUZLQQIWbEeun_jOOI.` ׉	 7cassandra://X-e3sdTaIrT5uSb5u5IK0SdXAlIqDgLV7xJNPh7i-I8 y3͠bd!r+`e׉E12
• Continued from previous page
Conclusion
Resilience translates to renewal, transformation and innovation. The above discussion illustrates that
Resilience is a capability that can be developed deliberately. Therefore, the configuration of strategic HRM
practices listed above can play a critical role in cultivating an organisational environment to facilitate
resilience building. It is not enough to implement just one of the blocks, public sector organisations need to
adopt them all to truly achieve resilience in this 21st Century environment.
Similarly, in order for organisational resilience to be achieved, individual capacity for resilience must be
developed strategically through HRM. The following quote sums up this point:
The public sector’s capacity for developing organizational resilience is achieved through
strategically managing HR to create individual competencies among core employees that when
aggregated at the org level make it possible for organisations to effectively absorb uncertainly,
develop situation-specific responses to threats and ultimately engage in transformative
activities so thaty thye can capitalize on disruptive surprises that potentitally threaten their
survival. - Lengnick Hall
It will be important therefore to equip public officers with skills to stay strong in difficult situations. One of
the key issues and one that is likely to threaten the status quo of the public sector is that of change.
Introducing a resilience focus and ethos therefore constitutes a change management effort.
It has been said that resilience is tested by unexpected events. Those member states who have
experienced environmental and fiscal challenges in the recent years, know first hand the debilitating
psychological, cultural and socio-economic effects of such events on a nation. The Seven Building Block
Model illustrates the confluence of seven distinct but interrelated Resilience Enablers: Building a Culture of
Resilience, Systemic Leadership, Connecting Employee to Organisational Strategy, Aligning HR Policies and
Practices, Reinforcing Business Processes, Workforce Planning and Integrated Talent Management. It
describes what is necessary for public sector organisations to fulfil their purpose and values; and how
people work together in fulfilling that purpose. It is hoped that the Model, cognizant of contextual
relevance, can serve as guide to countries trying to ‘bounce back’ from tragedies and aspiring to achieve
Resilience status.
Mrs. Rosemund R. Warrington is the in-house Certified Specialist in Strategic Human Resource
and Organisation Development & Effectiveness (HR/ODE) at CARICAD. Over the years, CARICAD
has provided HR/ODE services both in Public and Private Sector organisations in the Caribbean
region in the development of HR Strategies, HR Audits, Skills Assessments, Competency
Frameworks, Workload Measurements, Recruitment and Selection Strategies, Workforce
Planning, Competency-based Performance Management Systems, Job Evaluations, HRD Plans,
Capacity Building, HR Policy Manuals, Job Analysis and Job Description Writing, Succession
Planning, Training Systems Review and Re-Design, Organisational Capacity Assessments and
such.
׉	 7cassandra://B7WWqe58GTA8ZRIanfWwVCjuDRbtNjFsDOfXn377_t42` d!r+`6׉E13
By Rosemund R. Warrington
Specialist in Strategic Human Resource
and Organisation Development & Effectiveness, CARICAD
T
he COVID-19 Pandemic has demonstrated the
importance of business continuity in
organisations. From our observations, the
immediate response (in addition to safety and health
matters) to the pandemic by a number of
organisations focused on business continuity.
CARICAD, in response to this need, developed a
Business Continuity Plan (BCP) template at the start
of the pandemic in 2020, for customisation by
Member States. By adopting a Business Continuity
Plan in the heart of the pandemic, Member States
were able to deploy effective plans, putting in place
contingencies, identifying capabilities and
strengthening technological infrastructure. From a
Human Resources Management (HR) perspective, all
of these actions assisted with the management of
the sudden increase in remote work arrangements.
For instance, the use of technology including
business communication platforms such as Microsoft
Teams facilitated HR processes in recruitment,
learning management systems, and redeployment of
employees, among others. For most if not all
organisations, the COVID-19 pandemic has clearly
demonstrated that HR is an integral component of
business continuity. Public Sector Organisations
(PSOs) have been forced to re-focus and to re-direct
themselves towards becoming more flexible and
adaptable.
The pandemic required answers to important
questions:
• What does our talent bench look like?
• Do we have the capabilities for interim
replacements in the event of an unexpected
absence or multiple absences?
This article treats briefly
with some key HR
considerations to ensure
continuity in PSOs, as they
confront risks and
opportunities in times of
crises.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also shown that public
officers, whether senior managers, mid-level
officers, individuals in critical positions including
specialists, as well as administrative and technical
support staff are not immune to the virus. CARPHA
has reported a total of 3,255,544 cases in the
Caribbean as of March 7, 20221. The risk of further
cases occurring in the Caribbean, according to
CARPHA, remains Very High. PAHO also reported
that in January 2022 COVID-19 infections were
increasing in most countries in the region because of
the Omicron variant and that Caribbean islands had
the steepest increase in infections since the
pandemic began2. Public Sector employees no doubt
are included in this number. From CARICAD’s
knowledge of regional public services, public sector
programmes and projects continue to be impacted
by the absence of
COVID-19-affected employees at all levels, thus
creating disruptions in work continuity. ILO-OECD in
2020 reported loss of jobs and declined income,
globally resulting in supply shock3. It was also
reported that there were unprecedented fall-offs in
employment and total hours worked.
• Continues on next page
1 - CARPHA Situation Report #219
2 - Congressional Research Group – In Focus, 2022 Latin America and the Caribbean: Impact of COVID-19
January 21, 2022
3 - ILO-OECD “The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jobs and incomes in G20 economies” 2020
4 - ILO:COVID-19 eliminates the equivalent of 1.5 million jobs in the Caribbean ,2020
׉	 7cassandra://OrDb1lg5ZHYlW_DcNOvM22GWjBUZLQQIWbEeun_jOOI.` d!r+`7d!r+`6ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://L37IvVNMfpMfUNpc1TovdDxqY67C88PtKazsQDg32fU ` ׉	 7cassandra://u-WafaSf-AXpv5lUXQlNoKDJPPOXs_lTrygWFKTX8kA͵`t׉	 7cassandra://oGS7NpsYvQhV-kZeNV-pjMQHdEttlwqFip43w1rP3UA0` ׉	 7cassandra://DMuq_y8Bbm7QPz1nE6WE1gaUzG7lGh3InfUZf0DXkWs Y3͠bd" r+`hט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://ORfj3VVxQcNZuB1J-iRgH6uZlc9LsJXjTUJo3r37y3k ?` ׉	 7cassandra://ux07WGASNthBiF5riMw8Q5_H8NFSLdtDfJDZrKpzclEͮI`t׉	 7cassandra://OoqadtCWrT2FSXFtMDY2_x5OjQhb0pZS4trxWtcW8pU-=` ׉	 7cassandra://4ZQEHpEn7oT6jMqNrV40lC-R9xe1wxCJbNWIXB0pWpY 02͠bd"r+`i׉E014
• Continued from previous page
In fact, according to the ILO, there was a decline of
9.9% in total hours worked in the Caribbean, at the
peak of the pandemic4. Such data shows that the
impact of COVID-19 on organisations and the
workforce is significant.
COVID-19 has intensified the need for PSOs to
seriously consider well-tailored risk-management
programmes to plan for the unexpected absences or
loss of key persons during times of crises and
subsequent Recovery effort. The adoption of
succession planning and structured interim
replacement planning must now
become critical HR processes to
ensure business continuity. The
idea of succession planning is
certainly not new; however
attention to the process has
increased due to the COVID
-19 pandemic. Its adoption
will therefore require a
reinvigorated approach to
the development of talent
which includes re-skilling,
upskilling, and retooling of
public sector employees.
Succession
Succession
Planning requires
purposefulness
in terms of
deliberate action
by PSOs
Succession Planning and Talent
development go hand in hand and are two
critical HR processes. For clarity, talent development
focuses on processes and programmes that build
capabilities which in turn impact an organisation’s
ability to drive results. Succession Planning is the
process whereby an organisation ensures that
employees are recruited and developed to fill critical
roles. This process ensures that there will not be a
critical role vacant for which a replacement employee
is not prepared. It is now recognised that critical
roles are not only strategic in nature such as senior
managers, but also include those roles that are
critical to the success of essential workflows.
deliberate action
Planning requires
purposefulness
in terms of
While Succession Planning may be commonly
understood as the identification of critical positions
and preparing to move people into higher-level jobs,
I hold the view that succession planning is not just
about preparing for the automatic replacement of
employees who leave or retire. The concept is
broader. Succession planning is about developing a
clear approach to the identification and development
of talent for all levels of staff, through which skills
development interventions can be prioritised and
delivered. PSOs would therefore need to develop
clear approaches to the identification and
development of high performing talent,
identifying future workforce and talent
requirements, ensuring effective
retention, talent management,
robust data, and development
strategies across staffing levels.
As the above suggests,
Succession Planning requires
purposefulness in terms of
deliberate action by PSOs. It
is worth noting that the majority
of CARICAD Member States that
responded to our surey do not have
a Succession Planning programme in
place (CARICAD Survey-2018).
The reasons given for not having such an important
HR process in place include financial constraints, the
lack of HR systems to support succession planning,
the absence of meritocratic systems, and the failure
to recruit, train and retain the right individuals who
will lead in the future.
As PSOs re-evaluate their succession planning
efforts, several key factors should be borne in mind.
Succession Planning in the Public Sector must entail
active engagement by top executives, Public Service
• Continues on next page
׉	 7cassandra://oGS7NpsYvQhV-kZeNV-pjMQHdEttlwqFip43w1rP3UA0` d!r+`8׉E15
• Continued from previous page
Commissions and unions who are all required to
coalesce to build a holistic strategy and set the tone
for guiding the development of employees through
training, mentoring, coaching, shadowing, and
similar modalities. This concept of a talent growth
approach to succession planning is a key
consideration, whereby, not only are staff well
prepared and developed for the challenges of
strategic initiatives and the ever-changing world in
which work is conducted, but the systems,
structures, and cultural interactions within the public
sector must serve as active enablers. Ensuring
successful succession planning will require a keen
focus on individual plan development that sets the
foundation for learning experiences whether through
education, engagement or exposure/attachments.
Such actions will help strengthen the talent bench. A
talent growth approach to succession planning also
supports structured replacement planning which has
the objective of minimising the threat of interim
unplanned loss of key job holders as has been
experienced during the pandemic.
Some may be of the view that Succession Planning
is a waste of time and there is a perception that jobs
are not being filled by persons with the right
competencies. There may even be a tendency in our
region to see key posts in the public service as
rewards for loyalty and not competence. There are
those who may even say: “Why do succession
planning when no one is certain that he/she will be
appointed in identified key positions?” Whilst these
may be the realities in some of our organisations,
Succession Planning can be part of a wider talent
development plan that is aligned with recruitment,
retention, training and development and
performance management. I hold the view that an
approach that can be perceived as non-threatening
in terms of limiting cherry-picking or selectiveness
in relation to appointment, promotion, training etc.
and one that provides opportunities for employee
growth and development at all levels, in a fair and
equitable manner, would be better embraced in a
public sector setting.
There are costs in time and effort associated with
talent-based Succession Planning. However, having
the right staff, in the right place, and at the right
time, should represent a great return on investment
and improved organisational performance.
Succession Planning is a long-term investment that
continues to be worthwhile regardless of diminishing
budgets and prevailing cynicism.
In order to curtail risks associated with the loss of
valuable employees, organisations must engage in
succession planning. Effective implementation of
Succession Planning in public sector organisations in
our region is not an impossible feat. However, the
process must be focused and transparent in
ensuring that a pipeline of talent is available for
future leadership and interim replacements. It is
equally recognised that a fully integrated succession
system will require an effective enabling
environment including complementary HR strategies
and other systems.
As you consider your specific public service
environment you are invited to reflect on the
following questions:
• How might we re-calibrate our HR Strategies to
enable and adopt a talent-based approach to
Succession Planning?
• What barriers might there be to successful
implementation of Succession Planning in your
country and organisation?
• How can Succession Planning be done under
institutional fiscal constraints?
׉	 7cassandra://OoqadtCWrT2FSXFtMDY2_x5OjQhb0pZS4trxWtcW8pU-=` d!r+`9d!r+`8ppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://2P6wJ4DPlsh8flPovZM3TOt4QXcInUxmAqk4X_haQuA `׉	 7cassandra://qbNxEZ2uXQY-nkQnCTghDOKytEcMu9CZ0099x9voBBo;K`t׉	 7cassandra://hITCUOX6qDS0huIN9PhzEfBr3CTucDzNKdrS_ehOjA45` ׉	 7cassandra://ReGWvup46MVgBvAAQM7WBqDc_lSNJGQMe2BmLJ_jpmI 5&͠bd"r+`ט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://yYnEBcjuBwPFSbM_6qmdTaTupxejM2kIQmoN1ZnK3RA \
`׉	 7cassandra://O0Lp6qYsWANbo1LPDCGnLnSEHgH6LUOMLXnb8PPBTYc͙`t׉	 7cassandra://saLpu-htx66N4CTcbU1qwNid9rg3LmAECK7Yo0I6jQ84` ׉	 7cassandra://bH15S0OcKeMyI2IvKJLkaLG0fssVeN9GUa7WbP2L91c 	^N͠bd"r+` נd"r+`k %h9׉H 7https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---feb-2023-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`l %9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---hurricane-july-2022-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`m %U9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-march-2022-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`n %$o9׉H Ehttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december-2021-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`o %2a9׉H >https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-october-2021-newsletterGׁׁrנd"r+`p %@9׉H Mhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricads-horizon---hurricane-edition-june-2021Gׁׁrנd"r+`q %NU9׉H Ahttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-horizon-march-2021---finalGׁׁrנd"r+`r %\a9׉H Fhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-october-2020-newsletter---finalGׁׁrנd"r+`s %j{9׉H =https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-july-august-2020-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`t %x9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---hurricane-june-2020-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`u 9׉H =https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---covid-may-2020-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`v U9׉H 7https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-march-2020-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`w k9׉H 5https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-dec-2019-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`x $]9׉H 5https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-oct-2019-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`y 29׉H Phttps://publizr.com/car%C3%A2%E2%80%A2%C2%A6/caricad-august-2019-special-editionGׁׁrנd"r+`z @L9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-april-2019-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`{ No9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december-2018-newsletter-hlGׁׁrנd"r+`| \[9׉H Chttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-august-2018-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנd"r+`} jo9׉H >https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december2017-newsletterGׁׁrנd"r+`~ xG9׉H 9https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-horizon-july-finalGׁׁrנd"r+` T_
9ׁHhttp://www.caricad.netׁׁЈנd"r+` r
9ׁHmailto:caricad@caricad.netׁׁЈ׉E16
By Dr. Lois Parkes, Leadership
Development and Institutional
Strengthening Specialist, CARICAD
C
ARICAD member states, whether through
national vision plans or political manifestoes,
have promulgated promises around improving
quality of life and socio-economic development.
The vehicle through which this occurs is public
administration. According to the recent report on
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAMME
2022-2025 An International Benchmarking Study
- Sub-Study 2022, Public Administration “…refers to
all those activities and procedures related to the
formulation and implementation of policy and
governmental and other public programmes, and to
the management of the organisations and activities
involved.” This is done broadly through the
translation of state resources into the related outputs
i.e. service delivery, which in turn should lead to
impacts on the satisfaction of citizens and other
stakeholders, and align with good governance and
democratic principles.
Improving public service delivery is therefore about
improving the mechanisms for the translation of state
resources into needed outputs, which hopefully
should further translate into broader positive impacts
at the societal level. These mechanisms take the
forms of public policies, the supporting legal and
regulatory frameworks, and the efficiency and
effectiveness of business processes and any
attendant technology to support the efficiency and
effectiveness of government transactions, in which
citizens/clients engage.
Across Caribbean public services, there has been
some progress, particularly in the use of ICT, in
enhancing certain areas of public service delivery, a
notable example being immigration services and the
issuance of passports in many member states.
However, it is recognised that further improvements
are required and being demanded, to ensure that
public administration serves as a better facilitator of
socio-economic development in the Caribbean.
Public administration is not always a direct provider
of final goods, but plays a crucial facilitation role for
other players in the economy. At times, the service
orientation with the citizen/client at the centre is
lacking, or not properly understood in the public
service context. So where does one begin to better
address these service delivery challenges? A critical
first step is to start the conversation. Public Service
Leaders in particular have a responsibility to engage
their teams, organisations and stakeholders in this all
-important service delivery conversation. The
conversation begins by asking some key questions:
• What truly is our mission?
• Who do we serve, and why?
(understanding the ‘why’ is needed
for true engagement in the process)
• What services do we provide? Does a
listing of all of our services exist?
• How do we currently provide those services?
Online, in person?
• What standards do we have now for delivering
those services? (timeframe, quality etc.)
• What is the current level of satisfaction
with the delivery of these services?
• Do we track the delivery of these
services? Do we have an understanding
of the volume/frequency etc.?
• What changes (no matter how small)
could we make to improve service
delivery?
Once the conversation begins, it is then about
determining the service improvement strategy to be
pursued, being consistent and determined to continue
the conversation, and the willingness to be held
accountable for service improvement. The service
improvement journey starts with the conversation.
REF: PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAMME 2022-2025 An International Benchmarking Study Sub-Study 2022 The European Institute of Public
Administration (EIPA) in cooperation with the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations of the Netherlands
׉	 7cassandra://hITCUOX6qDS0huIN9PhzEfBr3CTucDzNKdrS_ehOjA45` d!r+`N׉E%17
FROM LEFT ARE: Angela Eversley, Trudy Waterman, Dr. Lois Parkes, Franklyn Michael,
Devon Rowe, Dario Richards and Rosemund Warrington.
THE TEAM
PREVIOUS EDITIONS CAN BE VIEWED AT:
The CARICAD Horizon is a regular publication of the
Caribbean Centre for Development Administration
(CARICAD). The Horizon has superseded the
“Chronicle”. The Editor-in-Chief is CARICAD’s
Executive Director, Devon Rowe. The Production Team
comprises: Franklyn Michael, Rosemund Warrington,
Dr. Lois Parkes, Trudy Waterman, Angela Eversley
and Petra Emmanuel.
February 2023
Special Hurricane Edition July 2022
March 2022
December 2021
October 2021
Special Hurricane Edition June 2021
March 2021
October 2020
July-August 2020
Special Hurricane Edition June 2020
Special COVID-19 Edition May 2020
March 2020
December 2019
October 2019
Board Meeting 2019 Special Edition
April 2019
December 2018
August 2018
December 2017
July 2017
1st Floor Weymouth Corporate Centre, Roebuck Street, Bridgetown, Barbados
Tel: 246-427-8535 Email: caricad@caricad.net Website: www.caricad.net
׉	 7cassandra://saLpu-htx66N4CTcbU1qwNid9rg3LmAECK7Yo0I6jQ84` d!r+`Od!r+`Npp,HORIZON - June 2023 FINAL >The latest edition of the Horizon Newsletter is now available.d!`nR@