׉?4ׁB!בCט+u׉׉ 7cassandra://hAlDcQCXXtLl93KXnMNO0QaUBZaJ887UPer2V-aSQQwy`׉ 7cassandra://TQlcP_C_7trG__0_CYjsc-GQfw2GRj1P-sUrSss8Xb4,`h׉ 7cassandra://5YjCmPLly14LxkDVwSfTuiF1nteIon3GRntoOjgSybs`׉ 7cassandra://a9PgARp0ic7AcsI8ydQMeJhQYisA5s3d2VJ14SEHB6A͠4`[!fxY"׈E`[!fxY"׉EKRS160 - RC160 - RU160 Recair introduces tomorrow’s heat exchangers today ׉ 7cassandra://5YjCmPLly14LxkDVwSfTuiF1nteIon3GRntoOjgSybs``[!fxY"`[!fxY"+בCט+u׉׉ 7cassandra://z1qLVWlj6s0Bth2A1ewj_7YgrFcWJyu1qZEq9J3NHX4`I׉ 7cassandra://R_VO0wNywkz9ns0FG2WIw8fYl0kUfZAqJBncYHsqmKIg`׉ 7cassandra://3zTrid_4tgPDEV6csNxaMChUbX289ZNy8kkCptlrpo8!e`׉ 7cassandra://pUA9X30p5wkYCeiyDx84T-MvGMlG0jtI28VSQJ3NRDAtH͠ i`[!fxY"׉ERecair sets the bar higher again With the successful Recair Sensitive160 (RS160), Recair has been at the forefront in the field of recuperators (heat exchangers) for many years. But we continue to innovate and seek solutions that will allow you to stand out in the market. The result: the Recair Comfort160 (RC160) and Recair Ultimate160 (RU160). Two completely newly developed recuperators for the most comfortable and efficient transfer of sensible energy. The shape and outer dimensions are unchanged, so that the three versions are interchangeable. The difference is in the internal geometry. The new Recair Comfort160 achieves the same excellent efficiency at a 40% lower pressure drop. More effective than most competitors and is rightfully ‘value for money’. In a nutshell, more comfort. In the Recair Ultimate160, we have managed to improve the already unparalleled effectiveness without increasing the pressure drop by an average of 2%. In short, more energy-saving. With these two new heat exchangers, Recair is once again linking maximum effectiveness to an extremely low pressure drop. On the one hand, in response to the market demand (ECO design - label A +). On the other hand, because we consider it a challenge to constantly raise the bar ever higher. The reuse of existing energy makes an important contribution to reducing CO2 production and thus to a sustainable society. Even more energy-saving, even more comfort. 2 ׉ 7cassandra://3zTrid_4tgPDEV6csNxaMChUbX289ZNy8kkCptlrpo8!e``[!fxY"׉E~Ventilation Material Through the pursuit of safety, comfort and energy efficiency, the buildings in which we live and work are becoming more airtight. As a direct result, there is an increased focus on mechanical ventilation. Energy recovery is therefore now a permanent feature. And the technology is still being developed. Recair uses the so-called “duct counterflow” principle. This provides a maximum heat transfer within the smallest possible recuperator dimensions. The challenge is to use less material for continued improved performance. Recair chooses plastics, the correct type of material for the best heat transfer. But even in terms of hygiene, fire retardance and the draining of condensate, modern plastics are preferred. By minimising the use of material, we are showing that we take our social responsibility seriously. Figure 1: The duct counterflow design of the RS160 3 `[!fxY"`[!fxY"+בCט+u׉׉ 7cassandra://VraLpaW2ok6Yn36cQb5OxdBlZx6OS11NqvJr4lNEM9k,<`I׉ 7cassandra://JUW7tCdWM10hpyob00aVpCaLrMUusN1Pu3v_GIAJj9E̓`׉ 7cassandra://zt04rmPUb5HUxmRM5U3mxRBzicFl-6IR4tyD4E88cIE)F`׉ 7cassandra://tDz8d34tUx1grBzPgaDS7qQzDNGjYzJJQ41x4SIG3Dk=6͠ i`[!fxY"׉ERecair Comfort vs. Recair Sensitive Excellent effectiveness at a 40% lower pressure loss The effectiveness and the pressure loss of the wellknown Recair Sensitive160 and Recair Comfort160 are included for comparison as a function of the air flow in Figures 2 and 3. Source: measurement report PL.16. WLG.285 conducted in January 2017 by the independent Figure 2: Effectiveness RC160 compared to RS160 95 94 research institute HLK Stuttgart. The full test report can be obtained from Recair. On the Recair website, you will find the “recuperator calculator”, a handy programme for selecting the appropriate heat exchanger. 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 0 Flow [m3 /h] RS160-300 4 RS160-400 RS160-500 RC160-300 RC160-400 RC160-500 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Effectiveness [%] ׉ 7cassandra://zt04rmPUb5HUxmRM5U3mxRBzicFl-6IR4tyD4E88cIE)F``[!fxY"׉EFigure 3: Pressure loss RC160 compared to RS160 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 50 Flow [m3 0 /h] RS160-300 RS160-400 RS160-500 RC160-300 RC160-400 RC160-500 5 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Pressure loss [Pa] `[!fxY"`[!fxY"+בCט+u׉׉ 7cassandra://NHUECtPIEYNr4CKfJFPld1QvBP_MTDSqZnunFyTDUng