׉?4ׁB!בCט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://GnowUmYiVScuITChRBsjTmOAE2PTkZwGiJJqUnBd4C4 TN`׉	 7cassandra://uPewaoBeQAUSlFdjitPkgPgfgksJJR2vrWbOLvHfXDQ͔
`t׉	 7cassandra://GjINu6lXYADsr4VgLNZpN94FYvXeUvZq6CcZFCOfJs45` ijxLZ>ט   8pu׈   Hlj  נijxLZ< Jd9 ׉SG
ׁׁrנijxLZ= d9 ׉SG
ׁׁr׈EijxLZ׉E Page 1
Volume 10, Issue 1
CARICAD’s
HR&ODE Strategic
Lead Rosemund
Warrington shares
her article on
Executive Director
CARICAD Devon
Rowe gives a
perspective on
׉	 7cassandra://GjINu6lXYADsr4VgLNZpN94FYvXeUvZq6CcZFCOfJs45` ijxLZijxLZppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://32HPXZ09-mUB-ejvg2KFyzA6DgU0v3Fx9OqbY0_9arU W`׉	 7cassandra://bQD6eiwsOeEkqWOwUdf_aYXHzDIlrnYPTmgy552Fdhkͻr`t׉	 7cassandra://4NmJFFxkfqWlddDvxSv766r6MQaTlbDJJiXFB8Mb9js8` ijxLZAט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://a3zfU2H7hKm5Ecl551HEiTWADb6MN3oKWI2ETUqP7bc ``׉	 7cassandra://DYL2jTqiyHfN-avHl8oL06EAT8qhlIsoTIsMIgoJ_P4ͨ`t׉	 7cassandra://JuokIdaMdtsmJMesQ-0Jj-qZjsvobj-PuJ44jAwEbzA5` ijxLZB׉EPage 2
Diligence, Digital Stewardship, and the
Future of Caribbean Public Service
A
s CARICAD marks 45 years of service to the region, we are reminded th
public administration is, at its core, a human endeavour. The stories shared
in this edition rooted in lived experience, institutional memory, and forwardlooking
analysis – underscore a truth echoed across our Digital Explainer Series
and reinforced by the United Nations Committee of Experts on Public
Administration (UN CEPA): resilient public sectors are built on values,
strengthened by people, and transformed through deliberate, ethical innovation.
Devon Rowe
Executive Director
CARICAD
Rosemund Warrington’s reflection on The Enduring Influence of Diligence brings us back to the fundamentals.
Her journey, shaped by mentors who embodied discipline, integrity, leadership, and empathy, mirrors the
ethos that UN CEPA identifies as essential for trustworthy institutions. Diligence, as she frames it, is not mere
busyness or blind loyalty; it is the disciplined practice of fairness, consistency, and civic responsibility. It is the
quiet, steady force that ensures public officers serve with purpose rather than perform for applause.
This value-centred approach is increasingly important as governments navigate the complexities of digital
transformation. Our Digital Explainer Series has repeatedly highlighted that technology alone does not
transform institutions – people do. Play, creativity, and curiosity are not soft skills; they are strategic capacities
that help public officers adapt, innovate, and collaborate across boundaries. When paired with diligence, they
create the conditions for continuous learning and future readiness.
In my article Central HR Institutions and AI, which focuses on the role of Ministries of Public Administration
and the Services Commissions in the era of AI, I expand this conversation into the digital era. AI presents
extraordinary opportunities for efficiency, accessibility, and data-driven decision-making. Yet, as UN CEPA
cautions, digital tools must be deployed within governance frameworks that protect human dignity, equity, and
accountability. The Caribbean public sector cannot afford to treat AI as a mere technical upgrade; it must be
approached as a governance shift requiring ethical oversight, workforce transition planning, and citizencentred
design.
This is where the stewardship role of Ministries of Public Administration and Public Service Commissions
becomes indispensable. Their mandate now extends beyond recruitment and administrative reform to include
digital governance, competency-based workforce development, and the safeguarding of public trust. As I note,
the challenge is not simply to integrate AI, but to do so without eroding morale, widening inequities, or
displacing workers without support. Governments must balance fiscal responsibility with social responsibility –
an equilibrium that UN CEPA identifies as central to sustainable public administration.
Across the region, the call is clear: diligence must evolve into digital diligence. This means upholding timeless
values while embracing new tools; strengthening institutions while empowering people; and ensuring that
innovation enhances, rather than replaces, the humanity at the heart of public service.
As we look ahead, CARICAD remains committed to supporting this transformation – anchored in integrity,
inspired by creativity, and guided by the unwavering belief that public service, when done with diligence,
remains one of the highest callings in our Caribbean community.
Article edited by AI.
׉	 7cassandra://4NmJFFxkfqWlddDvxSv766r6MQaTlbDJJiXFB8Mb9js8` ijxLZ׉E	Page 3
By Rosemund Warrington
HR&ODE Strategic Lead
Rising into Responsibility
I still remember my first day reporting for duty at
the Government Headquarters. The building itself
carried a quiet sense of importance, history,
standing tall as the seat of national administration.
For decades, its five floors had witnessed the
shaping of policy, the drafting of laws, and the
execution of decisions that touched the lives of
every citizen.
As I entered, the gentle ripples of the fishpond on
the ground floor caught my eye - a small but
moving reminder that life flows calmly even in a
place charged with weighty decisions. My office
was on the fifth floor. Climbing those steps felt like
more than a physical hike. It was an initiation into
public service, a rise into responsibility. I was
young, eager, and filled with the kind of nervous
energy that comes with stepping into something
bigger than myself. Reaching my floor, I paused
for a moment, proud to be given the chance to
serve. There and then, I made a silent promise to
myself: to be diligent, to uphold integrity, and to
give my best to the people of my country.
This reflection stemmed from the fact that, at that
stage of my youth, I was profoundly inspired by the dedication of the public officers I knew
personally. Their commitment taught me that public servants work for the community, not for private
interests. Their respect for the public’s trust ensured that government services were delivered with
fairness and efficiency.
Over the course of two decades in public service, I came to see diligence as the compass that
directed my every decision. This ethos shaped my approach in every role I held, starting as an
administrative clerk and culminating in my service as a senior public official.
In the public sector, diligence is often invoked as a desirable trait - one tied to reliability, hard work,
and professionalism. Yet, its true meaning and application are often clouded by misinterpretation and
sometimes aligned with political loyalty. This article highlights the lessons I learned in the public
service and the deeper virtues of disciplined service and civic responsibility. Each principle of the
acronym D.I.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. is aligned with behaviours and practices that strengthen resilient public
administration. Guiding Principles are included to encourage public officers to think critically about
how they apply these values in their work.
• Continues on the next page
׉	 7cassandra://JuokIdaMdtsmJMesQ-0Jj-qZjsvobj-PuJ44jAwEbzA5` ijxLZijxLZppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://FJD-Qb-1Yz5ub-BLT-qssEqSMBFGaz93VIr9X67uzdg 8`׉	 7cassandra://khqdforTurGzFp-P253w5I9XGEXmUGiNa8e8CvnqZcQͻ`t׉	 7cassandra://wzA6v6I2Xv6OZXVL0XIauPHYusvl_teF1Xjq1Gld6Uk3` ijxLZEט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://-sgi8OxNx33iTHmh-d21pedgYEHCXLpcGmNh5ylUf7k P`׉	 7cassandra://M-6Y_-z7_ePsfHmYw8Fs28tegeH1taomxjhPnftMLTc`t׉	 7cassandra://m0KIW6my6Row-SNo67B8UIcep1rQyNxJKh34qaQzWEs3` ijxLZF׉E|Page 4
The Lessons I Learned
In the 1980’s public service, I was surrounded by experienced mentors and senior officers
who not only knew the work but carried themselves with dignity, responsibility, and pride.
They embodied diligence in every sense of the word - not as a concept to be memorised, but
as a daily practice that shaped how they served and how I learned.
In those early years, I learned discipline through the example of officers who held firm to
procedures even when shortcuts seemed easier. They taught me that consistency is not rigidity, but
the backbone of fairness and accountability. It was not always the glamorous part of public service,
but it was the most essential.
Discipline is about maintaining ethical conduct, consistency, adherence to governance frameworks
and importantly, knowing when to act, when to wait, and when to walk away, regardless of how you
feel in the moment.
Guiding Principle: Maintain discipline in public service by applying rules and policies consistently
and fairly, even when under pressure or faced with challenging circumstances.
Integrity, too, was not a distant value; it showed up in the way my mentors spoke truth in
difficult rooms, upheld transparency in decisions, and reminded me that public trust is both
fragile and sacred. Their example taught me that character and credibility are the real
currency of service.
Integrity involves acting with honesty, transparency, and fairness to strengthen public trust.
Integrity requires doing the right thing even when no one is watching, staying true to your values,
and honouring your word, even when it is inconvenient or difficult.
Guiding Principle: Continuously demonstrate honesty and strong moral principles in all actions,
while actively reflecting on situations to identify areas where integrity can be strengthened.
Leadership, I came to see, was not about position but about influence and presence. The
senior professionals I looked up to led by listening, by guiding others, and by modeling
behaviour worth following. They practiced inclusive leadership, ensuring that every voice,
whether junior or senior, could find a place at the table.
Leadership requires the courage to make tough decisions, the humility to listen, the vision to
inspire, and the consistency to lead by example, even when no one is applauding.
Guiding Principle: Exhibit leadership in daily responsibilities by setting a positive example, guiding
others toward shared goals, and taking initiative to inspire teamwork and accountability.
I saw innovation not only in technology but in the creativity of colleagues who found ways
to deliver more with less, especially in times of constraint. This resilience, rooted in
resourcefulness, was its own form of excellence.
Innovation entails embracing creativity and adaptive thinking to design solutions. It therefore
requires curiosity to question the norm, courage to take risks, creativity to imagine new
possibilities, and persistence to turn ideas into reality, even in the face of failure.
Guiding Principle: Embrace creativity and continuous improvement by seeking out and applying
new ideas, tools, and methods that enhance efficiency and add value to your work.
Governance was not a word we repeated in policy documents alone; it was visible in the
systems of accountability, in the careful record-keeping, and in the culture of responsibility
that made institutions stronger than individuals. Good governance is about upholding
systems of accountability, participation, and oversight. It means making decisions that are
transparent, inclusive, and fair, serving the needs of all, not just the few. It hinges on putting
principles before politics, and long-term progress before short-term gain.
Guiding Principle: Promote transparency, accountability, and ethical decision-making by adhering
to established policies, documenting actions accurately, sharing information openly, and taking
• Continues on the next page
׉	 7cassandra://wzA6v6I2Xv6OZXVL0XIauPHYusvl_teF1Xjq1Gld6Uk3` ijxLZ׉EPage 5
responsibility for outcomes that support effective and responsible governance.
What marked my journey most deeply, however, was empathy. In moments of crisis, I saw
colleagues extend compassion to citizens who were hurting and to coworkers facing personal
struggles. I saw empathy married to professionalism: the ability to enforce rules without
stripping away humanity.
The foundation of empathy is not just understanding someone’s pain — it is choosing to stand with
them in it. This comes down to stepping into someone else’s world without trying to fix or judge it.
Guiding Principle: Demonstrate understanding and compassion by considering the human impact
of your decisions and actions, listening actively to others, and responding with respect and
sensitivity to their needs and circumstances.
Networking, capacity, and excellence became the rhythms of my work life. Networking
meant collaboration across ministries, departments and agencies, building bridges where
silos once stood. Capacity was the daily discipline of learning, whether in formal training or
informal mentoring. One of my mentors often reminded me, “You have capacity” - a simple
phrase that carried deep belief in my potential. At the time, I didn’t fully understand it, but those
words stayed with me. Excellence meant never settling for “good enough,” but striving to add
value in everything I touched.
Networking is about building partnerships and inter-agency collaboration. Capacity is grounded in
investing in people and systems for future readiness. And, excellence involves pursuing high
standards in service delivery and performance. When networking, capacity, and excellence come
together, they create not just achievement, but influence, anchored in relationships, driven by
potential, and sustained by high standards.
Guiding Principles: Build and maintain professional relationships that foster collaboration,
knowledge sharing, and partnerships aimed at improving service delivery and organisational
effectiveness. Commit to continuous learning and skill development to enhance your ability to
perform effectively, adapt to change, and contribute meaningfully to organisational goals. Strive
for the highest standards of quality and professionalism in all tasks by paying attention to detail,
seeking feedback, and consistently delivering results that reflect pride in your work.
Then and Now
Looking back, I realise that diligence was never just about completing tasks or following rules. It
was about a mindset and a culture that valued people, integrity, and service. It was about being
shaped by others who believed deeply in the worth of public service and finding my own
gratification in carrying that torch. It was about the steady and wholehearted commitment to
doing what is right, with care, consistency, and purpose, even when the spotlight is off.
Today, when I reflect on my years of service, I do so with gratitude. Gratitude for the mentors who
guided me, the colleagues who stood alongside me, the leaders who inspired me, and the citizens
whose trust reminded me of why the work mattered. Diligence, for me, became not only a principle
but a way of life. A way of showing up fully, respectfully, and responsibly in service to the public.
The Greatest Impact
Within our regional landscape, the public sector calls for an equally intentional and focused
approach. Diligence should be the force that sustains timely service delivery, data accuracy, policy
integrity, and public confidence. Yet, too often, the word is diluted and confused with busyness,
blind loyalty, or political alignment.
A diligent officer is not defined by their allegiance to a minister, party, or political agenda. Public
officers are stewards of the people and, as such, must perform their duties with integrity, act with
purpose, and never lose sight of whom they serve.
Through my own journey in public service, I have learned that the greatest impact does not come
from authority, but from accountability to the people we serve, and to the values we uphold.
This article is dedicated to my esteemed mentors — Juliet Lewis, Rhoda George, Cary
Harris, and to the memories of Dr. Carissa Etienne, Charles Maynard, Eric Watty and
Alfred Leevy — whose influences have been particularly profound.
׉	 7cassandra://m0KIW6my6Row-SNo67B8UIcep1rQyNxJKh34qaQzWEs3` ijxLZijxLZppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://VK06oeTNR11wZxEH_i9lRNHa1gKjhe0ugYFjbld6hMU PX`׉	 7cassandra://sxD_OfuWslgf0VxAZ1P4kMxD20waf9QeTQvP0NWaI14`t׉	 7cassandra://zsTU83A0B1FG4SXxCGg63xCoWd2iFPp7TL-tE1TyELs7` ijxLZHט 8 8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://W2-9BG2Fe_wJ1tsH0wTpCHHIISiaYU_vC27iVamcF7A `׉	 7cassandra://PgCTL4FPOFGeMJ9-UqMz0i2vOD9wa2XCWttacyLBoYIͻ@`t׉	 7cassandra://KuSqTTfzfdtr8swkO8qdUKMwEL7XLBBNc-dyo8DI8-04` ijxLZI׉EPage 6
By Devon Rowe, Executive Director, CARICAD
T
Abstract
This article explores
the pivotal role
of Ministries
of Public Administration
and Public Service
Commissions in
guiding ethical,
inclusive, and
citizen-centered AI
integration within
the public sector.
It highlights both the
transformative potential
and challenges
of AI, including
workforce
displacement, data
privacy, and
institutional readiness.
Emphasising strategic
leadership,
collaboration, and
capacity-building,
it calls for a balanced
approach that
safeguards human
dignity while advancing
innovation
and efficiency in
governance.
echnology, and more recently Artificial Intelligence (AI), has become a force
in reshaping how societies govern, serve, and connect with their citizens.
While its adoption in the public sector holds transformative potential, it also
brings profound challenges related to ethics, equity, institutional readiness and
likely reduction in the size of the public workforce. In the evolving landscape,
Ministries of Public Administration (MPAs) – also referred to in some CARICAD
member states as Ministries of Public Service and Public Service Commissions
(PSCs) – are not simply just administrative bodies, instead, they are even more
important in their stewardship of fair, responsive, and citizen-centered
governance.
Historically, MPAs have championed administrative reform and public sector
capacity-building, while PSCs are tasked with promoting merit-based recruitment
and ensuring ethical oversight in the public service. These foundational functions
remain indispensable, but the stakes have increased. The rapid acceleration of AI
demands that both institutions shift gears, to become even more forward
looking, embrace a more involved mandate that guides responsible digital
transformation while putting considerations for the stability of the public service
and motivation of public officers also at the core of future public sector
transformation.
When used wisely, AI has the potential to make a real difference in how public
services are delivered. It can take over repetitive tasks, freeing staff to focus on
more complex, people-centred work; keep certain services available around the
clock; support better decision-making with solid data; and even help us
anticipate social and economic needs before they become urgent. Imagine a
simple chatbot helping citizens get answers about licensing or benefits without
waiting in long lines, or a planning tool that helps ensure limited resources go
where they are needed most, whether it is school supplies in rural areas or relief
aid after a hurricane. These kinds of innovations not only improve access and
transparency but also signal a paradigm shift toward agile public institutions.
However, despite these benefits, the integration of AI also raises significant
concerns. Job displacement in routine to senior roles calls for thoughtful
workforce redeployment, re-skilling and transition programmes particularly in
small island resilient states. Machine and algorithmic “blind spot” biases may
threaten fairness, especially in high-stakes areas like hiring or benefits
distribution. Complete dependence on automation may “dumb-down” human
judgment and civic trust. Data privacy and trust become critical issues as
governments collect and analyse vast amounts of personal information. The
question to be asked is: “Should AI remain a tool of empowerment and
productivity enhancement or a mechanism for replacement?”.
• Continues on the next page
׉	 7cassandra://zsTU83A0B1FG4SXxCGg63xCoWd2iFPp7TL-tE1TyELs7` ijxLZ׉E1Page 7
Is it the joint responsibility of the PSC and MPA to address potential job losses arising from the integration of
AI, even when such changes may lead to greater efficiency? Should they prioritise the potential financial
benefits to the taxpaying public — such as a reduction in public sector wage costs — resulting from AI
implementation? At the same time, is it also their role to safeguard the morale and motivation of the public
sector workforce, ensuring that innovation does not come at the expense of people or productivity? Or should
the PSC and MPA review the public value provided to citizens? We must also address the social costs of
displacement of public sector workers. Governments do not have the luxury of ignoring any addition to the
unemployment numbers as this could be an exercise of moving employees from the Public Service wage bill
to the social services balance sheet.
The PSC and MPA, in collaboration with agencies responsible for digital transformation, e-Government, and
ICT, share a responsibility to assess the impact of AI on both government efficiency and the citizens it
serves. To fulfil this role effectively, PSCs and MPAs must strengthen their capacity, and this involves building
knowledge, skills, and practical understanding of how AI can be applied to enhance public service delivery.
While improved technology may reduce public sector wage costs, potential job losses must also be addressed
through competency-based recruiting, reskilling and support. Safeguarding workforce morale is essential to
maintaining a committed and effective public service. Achieving the right balance between innovation, fiscal
responsibility, and human dignity is key.
To lead in this new reality, MPAs and PSCs must embrace strategic roles that go beyond their traditional
operations whilst conducting their affairs within constitutional provisions. They must help to shape and
champion inclusive national AI strategies that align innovation with societal priorities.
CARICAD supports the building of digital capacity across the public service as essential — public officers must
be trained in data literacy, tech governance, and, dare I say, human-AI collaboration. Recruitment policies
must be updated to prioritise interdisciplinary skills to attract new talent committed to public values.
Moreover, agile governance practices – like pilot projects and experimentation – should be encouraged where
possible, and include feedback loops, ensuring AI systems reflect the lived experiences and needs of citizens,
especially marginalised groups. Just as important, there must be a consistent commitment to monitor and
evaluate AI’s impact over time.
This evolution requires a leadership ethos grounded in integrity and vision. MPAs and PSCs must act as
stewards of human dignity, not simply managers of systems. By embedding fairness, transparency, and
public engagement into the heart of AI reforms, these institutions can preserve trust in government at a time
when it matters most. It is not our belief that AI should replace empathy, or accountability – instead, it
should amplify them.
In conclusion, the digital age calls for institutions that are resilient, ethical, and future-ready. MPAs and PSCs
must continue to rise to this moment, not by leaving change to chance, but by actively shaping the future
with courage, deliberate action and purpose. Their leadership will determine whether AI becomes a tool for
the public good or a technology for disconnection. The responsibility is immense but so is the opportunity to
build a smarter, fairer, and more human-centred public sector.
׉	 7cassandra://KuSqTTfzfdtr8swkO8qdUKMwEL7XLBBNc-dyo8DI8-04` ijxLZijxLZppבCט   8pu׉׉	 7cassandra://40iTYQ3UqE_80dNkPPQorsI5ZJukYo7Mwm_dk8_ge9w `׉	 7cassandra://L27aflrqAIMaPS8V6rWK9kf4oncYcPvYBXmol5dPse0͌|`t׉	 7cassandra://ESwrepObMc-nxqfBf7TgH76L5vRAWFur4BU0LTSByG4-J` ijxLZe נijxLZK K̍9׉H 8https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---montserrat-2025GׁׁrנijxLZL Z9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---hurricane-july-2025-finalGׁׁrנijxLZM iF9׉H 9https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---march-2025-finalGׁׁrנijxLZN xZ9׉H <https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---december-2024-finalGׁׁrנijxLZO ̇9׉H =https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---september-2024-finalGׁׁrנijxLZP 9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---hurricane-july-2024-finalGׁׁrנijxLZQ d9׉H ?https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---march-april-2024-finalGׁׁrנijxLZR S9׉H 7https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---feb-2023-finalGׁׁrנijxLZS E9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-march-2022-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנijxLZT bKW9׉H Ehttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december-2021-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנijxLZU bZL9׉H >https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-october-2021-newsletterGׁׁrנijxLZV bi9׉H Mhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricads-horizon---hurricane-edition-june-2021GׁׁrנijxLZW bxC9׉H Ahttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-horizon-march-2021---finalGׁׁrנijxLZX bP9׉H Fhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-october-2020-newsletter---finalGׁׁrנijxLZY be9׉H =https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-july-august-2020-finalGׁׁrנijxLZZ b9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---hurricane-june-2020-finalGׁׁrנijxLZ[ b̽9׉H =https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon---covid-may-2020-finalGׁׁrנijxLZ\ bG9׉H 7https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-march-2020-finalGׁׁrנijxLZ] AKT9׉H 5https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-dec-2019-finalGׁׁrנijxLZ^ AZI9׉H 5https://publizr.com/caricadsec/horizon-oct-2019-finalGׁׁrנijxLZ_ Ai̾9׉H Phttps://publizr.com/car%C3%A2%E2%80%A2%C2%A6/caricad-august-2019-special-editionGׁׁrנijxLZ` Ax;9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-april-2019-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנijxLZa AX9׉H Bhttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december-2018-newsletter-hlGׁׁrנijxLZb AG9׉H Chttps://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-august-2018-newsletter-finalGׁׁrנijxLZc AW9׉H >https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-december2017-newsletterGׁׁrנijxLZd A79׉H 9https://publizr.com/caricadsec/caricad-horizon-july-finalGׁׁrנijxLZh pGz9ׁHhttp://www.caricad.netׁׁЈנijxLZg G̒9ׁHmailto:caricad@caricad.netׁׁЈ׉E+Page 8
CAN YOU IDENTIFY THIS LOCATION?
This photograph was taken by CARICAD’s resident photographer Franklyn Michael while on one of his many
travels. We will reveal the location on our Instagram page caricadinfo on January 30th, 2026.
THE TEAM
The CARICAD Horizon is a regular publication of the
Caribbean Centre for Development Administration
(CARICAD). The Horizon has superseded the “Chronicle”.
The Editor-in-Chief is CARICAD’s Executive Director,
Devon Rowe. The Production Team comprises: Franklyn
Michael, Rosemund Warrington, Dr. Lois Parkes, Trudy
Waterman, Angela Eversley, Roje Sealy, Keishana
Trotman and Petra Emmanuel.
Special Montserrat Edition 2025
Special Hurricane Edition July 2025
March 2025
December 2024
August-September 2024
Special Hurricane Edition July 2024
March-April 2024
February 2023
March 2022
Previous editions can be viewed at:
December 2021
October 2021
Special Hurricane Edition June 2021
March 2021
October 2020
July-August 2020
Special Hurricane Edition June 2020
Special COVID-19 Edition May 2020
March 2020
December 2019
October 2019
Board Meeting 2019 Special Edition
April 2019
December 2018
August 2018
December 2017
July 2017
1st Floor Weymouth Corporate Centre, Roebuck Street, Bridgetown, Barbados
Tel: 246-427-8535 Email: caricad@caricad.net Website: www.caricad.net
׉	 7cassandra://ESwrepObMc-nxqfBf7TgH76L5vRAWFur4BU0LTSByG4-J` ijxLZ:׈EijxLZ;ijxLZ:pp,HORIZON - January 2026 FINAL FThe first edition of the Horizon Newsletter for 2026 is now available.ijHlj]%